While it makes for a great catch-phrase and is oft quoted by the media, some find calling a presidential inauguration "the most peaceful transition of power the world knows" a misnomer. I am inclined to agree with William Huff's assertion--that it is "Rubbish!"
However, I do give a nod to all the pomp and circumstance surrounding presidential inaugurations. As a historian, how could I not? I revel in studying the past! The 2009 Inaugural Theme, "A New Birth of Freedom" is most fitting. Aside from commemorating the 200th anniversary of Lincoln's birth, history is being remade when Barack Obama utters those 39 words: "“I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. So help me God.''
Of course, there has been a lot of discourse comparing the two and the challenges presented them. After careful examination of the links highlighted in this posting, do you find such a comparison valid? Why or why not? If not, which president would you select as more fitting, and why?
